Pedophiles Trying to Ride Homosexuals’ Coattails

People such as myself and my wife have insisted for quite some time that not only are the goals of the homosexual lobby (e.g., same-sex “marriage”) wrong in and of themselves, but that, if approved, they would have harmful corollaries including (but not limited to) the acceptance of pedophilia. Many proponents of the homosexual agenda said we were barking mad, that such a terrible thing would never happen. Guess what?

We were right. They were wrong.

As this article describes in painstaking, horrifying detail, several … what shall I call them? … “adult lovers of children” are clamoring to receive the same legal and societal recognition (read: approval) that same-sex relationships are more and more receiving. Supporters of so-called “adult-minor” relationships (who like to call themselves “minor-attracted” people) insist that their attractions and desires are simply another “alternative lifestyle” or “sexual orientation” that cannot be helped and should not be hindered. As if that weren’t bad enough, the oh-so-trendy American Psychiatric Association is actually considering a proposal for a new, molester-friendly definition of pedophilia. It would not surprise or shock me in the least if the APA accepted this new definition, considering it long ago (1973) removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders and in 1998 issued a report stating “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

First of all, I can point to plenty of people who clearly are suffering negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences. Secondly, however—and this is a case of me hating being right—these “minor-attracted” people have a valid point of logic on their side.

What I and my wife and other social conservatives have argued is that if homosexuals are granted various “rights” (such as being allowed to “marry”), then there is no logical defense against other deviant behaviors being legitimized and legalized and granted approval: if you’re going to redefine marriage in one way, you absolutely cannot argue against redefining it in a host of other ways as well—to do so would be hypocritical and inconsistent. If you’re going to allow same-sex “marriage,” then logic dictates that polygamists, pedophiles, bestialists, and incestuists also should be allowed to “marry.”

“Poppycock,” said the homosexuals. “That’s just an excuse to deny us our rights. That would never happen.” No? Well, it’s in the process of happening right now. You know, 50 or 60 years ago, I’m sure that no one, not even the most hopeful homosexual or pessimistic conservative, could have guessed that 50 or 60 years later they’d be witnessing governmental, societal, and (in some cases) even religious approval of homosexual relationships. Yet they are. So do you really think that, in another 50 or 60 years, we couldn’t possibly be witnessing governmental, societal, and (in some cases) even religious approval of pedophilic relationships?

You’d better think again.


1 Comment (+add yours?)

  1. Erick
    Nov 26, 2012 @ 09:49:56

    Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your
    blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently quickly.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: